The agent monitors new opportunities, reviews the conditions and prepares a concise decision brief with the key deadlines, requirements and risks based on your company profile.

Every opportunity is assessed against agreed company criteria, and material conclusions stay linked to public evidence.
Clear mismatches are separated early, while uncertain but potentially valuable opportunities remain visible.
Each tender is reviewed against the same services, experience, capacity and commercial limits.
The recommendation, deadlines, requirements, risks and next action are presented together.
From a new notice to a concise recommendation for the responsible person.
Identifies new and changed tenders in the markets you follow.
Compares the opportunity with your services, experience, evidence and agreed limits.
Finds the important deadlines, qualification requirements, evaluation rules and risks in the public documents.
Presents the recommendation, reasoning and the exact next action for your team.
A compact brief for deciding whether the opportunity deserves further work.
Pursue, review further or skip, with a short explanation.
Scope, value, deadline, contract duration and evaluation rules.
What is already supported, what still needs proof and what may affect delivery or price.
The specific internal check, document or decision needed before moving forward.
The agent prepares the information but does not submit a bid or make a commercial commitment on your behalf.
Uses public tender evidence and the company context you have approved.
A responsible person confirms the decision.
Separates a missing document from a real capability gap.
Unknown facts are flagged, not guessed.
Creates a focused list of open questions, evidence and internal checks.
The agent does not sign or submit the bid.
The agent is adapted to the supplier and its actual tender decision process.
Yes. The agent is configured around your services, delivery history, qualification evidence, capacity, partner options and commercial limits.
Yes. It reviews the publicly available notice and attachments and links material conclusions back to the source evidence.
We begin with 3–5 previous tenders that show a good fit, a clear rejection and several difficult cases. This gives us the criteria and examples needed for a useful pilot.
Send us 3–5 previous tenders. We will show what company-specific screening and a decision brief could look like for your team.